myles
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by myles on Dec 15, 2014 6:06:38 GMT
I remember at one point hearing/reading about the animals being their own systems within the art, and even farther; some of the strikes could also be considered systems on their own. At least if I understood it correctly. I realize this would be more appropriate for some strikes than others. Using the lion system as an example; training seizing or grasping solely isn't very realistic compared to placing all your focus into cutting or chopping.
I also remember, back when I first started training, JB mentioned that training one animal at a time is preferable. I think this has actually rubbed off on my focus narrowing to mainly one attack method a lot of the time. For better or worse, it seems apparent to me that by putting x amount of hours into training one thing should make that much more refined than spending time skewed across many different methods.
However, in an effort to avoid "familiarity blindness", I have been spending a lot more time comparing things lately. Still with a main focus, but trying to root out differences and similarities. Things like: whats are the differences in the way the lion and dragon use chopping strikes, or phoenix? How is the entering strikes from dragon different than the way rooster uses entering? I never liked the lying step forms in the lion system, but having changed focus to bear I find I like the way the bear's lying step forms are laid out.
|
|
myles
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by myles on Dec 15, 2014 17:02:48 GMT
I had trouble with sweeping when I first started training, it was very unnatural to me. I didn't understand the forces for a long time, or the angles, or how to use it. The focus on the forearm over the fist was strange and newer to me. Elbow, wrist, knee, were familiar at that time but the forearm was awkward and clumsy. By changing focus to dragon for a couple years and it's focus on the palm, I was better able to understand some of the underpinnings of YSB so when we were told to train lion I went back with a much better understanding, sweeping was no longer as foreign.
You mentioned natural. I have never really found sweeping to be natural to me. Though I am far more familiar with it than any other strike. But still, after all the time I've put into it, some of the other strikes I've devoted far less time to are more natural. Chopping, for example, feels far smoother to me and I think my understanding of it's use, force, and application are much better. Having invested so much time into sweeping I feel I might have better placed my efforts into something that came more naturally to me. But, then again maybe my understanding gained from sweeping had helped my understanding of other strikes. It boils down to the chicken and the egg there.
My obsession in singular attack method focus probably has a little rooting in my thoughts on refinement vs. starting over with something new. If my goal is to be able to use it, refinement should yield the best results I would think. Not that I don't like training new things, it keeps everything fresh, new, cool. It certainly helps to add depth to already obtained knowledge, and I do feel a strong draw from the greener grass in other areas at times.
Like you I'm quite interested in the weekly training concepts Beijing people are working on. Wouldn't mind hearing from study groups state side or otherwise either on current training focuses.
|
|